$1.67M Home Bought Before Selling, During Maternity Leave
A couple with two newborn children wanted to buy their next home for $1,670,000 before selling their current one, with one partner on maternity leave until January 2027. We structured it as a bridging loan with St George.
✓ Real client file, published anonymously✓ Licensed under ACL 387025
A mechanical design technician with around five years at his employer, and a chemist with more than three years at hers, currently on maternity leave after the arrival of their two children.
Their current home has been owned since May 2022, and they had $608,353 in savings to put toward the next one. They had found a home in the same suburb and did not want the purchase to hinge on when their current home sold.
The Goal
Approval to buy their next home for $1,670,000
Flexibility around the sale of their current property
An offset facility so future savings reduce the interest charged
Freedom to make extra repayments without penalty
The Problem
They first applied through their existing lender, then decided a bridging loan suited them better, which meant moving lenders.
Their income also looked weaker on paper than it was. One partner was not due back at work until January 2027, and the other had a year-to-date income below his current base wage.
Item
Position
Issue for a lender
Current home
$1,300,000 expected sale price, existing loan to be refinanced
Not yet sold
New home
$1,670,000
Purchase proceeds before the sale
His income
$101,500 base
Year-to-date income lower after unpaid paternity leave and a $15,500 pay rise in March 2026
Her income
$89,537 on return to work
On maternity leave until January 2027
Savings
$608,353
—
What We Did
Moved their lending to St George, refinancing the existing home loan as part of the bridging structure.
Worked the figures off an expected sale price of $1,300,000, in line with the valuation, with a bridging loan of $1,105,000.
Had his base salary assessed at the current $101,500, with the gap to year-to-date income explained by unpaid paternity leave and the pay rise.
Relied on her return-to-work income of $89,537, supported by a letter from her employer confirming her return in January 2027.
Put $608,353 of savings toward the purchase, leaving around $62,000 of surplus cash after settlement to cover the servicing shortfall until she returns to work.
Completed a full budget and reviewed six months of bank statements: living expenses of $5,951.72 a month, declared $589.87 above the lender's benchmark.
Placed the lending on a standard variable package with an offset facility.
The Result
Metric
Figure
Lender
St George
Purchase price
$1,670,000
Expected sale price, current home
$1,300,000
Bridging loan
$1,105,000
Peak debt
$1,914,344
Peak LVR
64.45%
End debt
$690,000
End LVR
41.31%
Product
Standard variable package with offset
Income accepted for servicing
$191,037
The Bridging Outcome
At its peak, with both homes held, total debt is $1,914,344 against $2,970,000 of property. Once the current home sells, debt falls to $690,000, secured against the new home alone.
Measure
Peak, before the sale
End, after the sale
Debt
$1,914,344
$690,000
Property securing the debt
$2,970,000
$1,670,000
LVR
64.45%
41.31%
Key Takeaways
A bridging loan lets you buy first and sell second. The lender assesses both the peak debt and the end debt.
Return-to-work income can be accepted during parental leave where the employer confirms the date and salary in writing.
Surplus cash held back at settlement can cover the gap until the second income resumes.
This case study is a real client outcome published anonymously. It is general information only and not financial, tax, credit or legal advice. Figures are specific to this client and are not a guide to the outcome for anyone else. Lender policies, rates and fees are as at the time of the application and change. Seek advice from a licensed broker, financial adviser and registered tax agent.
1. Arranged a loan when our small business situation made it difficult to qualify. 2. Met requirements to have funding available by a specified date. 3. Understood my needs to setup debt recycling to allow tax structuring. 4. Communicated well throughout.
I would use their services again.
Nick Webb
★★★★★
Alex, Jess and the Kingfisher team were second to none and their process from start to finish was faultless. As a self-employed business owner, it can be difficult to obtain finance at the best of times. The Kingfisher team made this an easy and efficient proposition and their continued transparent and efficient communication ensured we were kept up to date at all times. Highly recommend them for your finance needs!
Holly Brooks
★★★★★
Alex and Jess dealt with our investment loan and provided a top tier service. They kept us up to date and communicated every step of the process making it a seamless and smooth experience! Awesome work team we will definitely be back for future loans!
Mitchell Bath
★★★★★
Jess from Kingfisher was outstanding. I couldn't fault her communication, expertise or dedication to finding the best loan for our situation. The entire process was seamless from start to finish. We'll definitely be using Kingfisher again in the future. A top-tier organisation.