US$58K of Vested Employer Shares Counted Toward a $2.1M Home
A principal software engineer whose pay arrives as salary, allowance, bonus and US-dollar employer shares wanted a fully assessed pre-approval on a $2.1m home. We had the share income agreed with the lender before lodging.
✓ Real client file, published anonymously✓ Licensed under ACL 387025
A principal software engineer with more than 4.5 years at his employer, promoted from a senior role earlier in the year with a $22,400 pay rise.
He has focused on saving and investing: over $610,000 in cash, around $915,000 in managed funds and around $990,000 in shares. He budgets carefully and wanted his first offer on a home backed by a pre-approval he could rely on.
The Goal
A fully assessed pre-approval to buy a home worth up to $2,100,000, before making any offers
Multiple offset accounts
Freedom to make extra repayments without penalty
The Problem
Only about 63% of his package is base salary. The rest arrives as an annual bonus and as employer shares that vest in US dollars, income that only counts toward borrowing power if the lender's credit team agrees how to treat it.
His payslips added a second issue. Because the promotion came part-way through the year, his annualised year-to-date income sat below his current base wage.
Income source
Annual amount
Issue for a lender
Base salary
$203,200
Year-to-date income understates it after a $22,400 pay rise
Remote work allowance
$600
—
Annual bonus
$38,780
Paid once a year
Vested employer shares (655 units)
US$58,340
Paid in US dollars, value moves with the share price
What We Did
Placed the lending on a standard variable package with multiple offset accounts.
Had his base salary assessed at the current $203,200, with the gap to year-to-date income explained by the promotion.
Included the $38,780 annual bonus and $600 remote work allowance.
Workshopped the vested share income with the lender's business development manager and credit team before lodging, then entered it using the method credit advised.
Completed a full budget and reviewed six months of bank statements: living expenses of $4,534 a month, declared above the lender's $4,173 benchmark.
Documented an exit strategy, as the 30-year term runs past his planned retirement at 70: a projected loan balance of about $291,460 at that point against projected superannuation of $733,394.
The Result
Metric
Figure
Outcome
Fully assessed pre-approval
Loan amount
$1,460,000
Property value
$2,100,000
LVR
69.52%
Rate
6.14% variable
Loan term
30 years
Features
Multiple offset accounts, extra repayments without penalty
Income accepted for servicing
$286,633
The Income Outcome
The 655 units that vested in 2025 came to US$58,340. The lender discounted that as foreign income, converted it to Australian dollars and discounted it again as investment income, accepting $44,053. With the bonus also counted, his assessable income is $82,833 higher than base salary and allowance alone, an uplift of 40.6%.
Income line
Accepted for servicing
Base salary
$203,200.08
Remote work allowance
$600.00
Annual bonus
$38,780.00
Vested employer shares, after lender discounting
$44,053.39
Total income relied on
$286,633.47
Uplift over base salary and allowance
$82,833.39
Key Takeaways
Share-based pay can count toward borrowing power, but only where the lender agrees the treatment. Settling that before lodging avoids a decline.
A recent pay rise can make year-to-date income look lower than it is. It needs to be explained in the application.
Where a loan term runs past retirement, lenders expect a documented exit strategy.
This case study is a real client outcome published anonymously. It is general information only and not financial, tax, credit or legal advice. Figures are specific to this client and are not a guide to the outcome for anyone else. Lender policies, rates and fees are as at the time of the application and change. Seek advice from a licensed broker, financial adviser and registered tax agent.
1. Arranged a loan when our small business situation made it difficult to qualify. 2. Met requirements to have funding available by a specified date. 3. Understood my needs to setup debt recycling to allow tax structuring. 4. Communicated well throughout.
I would use their services again.
Nick Webb
★★★★★
Alex, Jess and the Kingfisher team were second to none and their process from start to finish was faultless. As a self-employed business owner, it can be difficult to obtain finance at the best of times. The Kingfisher team made this an easy and efficient proposition and their continued transparent and efficient communication ensured we were kept up to date at all times. Highly recommend them for your finance needs!
Holly Brooks
★★★★★
Alex and Jess dealt with our investment loan and provided a top tier service. They kept us up to date and communicated every step of the process making it a seamless and smooth experience! Awesome work team we will definitely be back for future loans!
Mitchell Bath
★★★★★
Jess from Kingfisher was outstanding. I couldn't fault her communication, expertise or dedication to finding the best loan for our situation. The entire process was seamless from start to finish. We'll definitely be using Kingfisher again in the future. A top-tier organisation.