Home › Case Studies › $402K on a Master Limit
- Borrower
- Married couple, two children
- Loan type
- Refinance + consolidation + investment split
- Property
- $1.26m home
- Lender
- AMP
- Adviser
- Set up on their financial planner's advice
- Lending today
- $588K non-deductible + $402K deductible
$402K
initial deductible split
~$10.5K
anticipated yearly tax saving*
The Borrower
A married couple with two children: an IT contractor in a permanent salaried role since March 2021, earning $281,060 a year, and a senior advisor with her employer since December 2015 on a base salary of $117,286.
They have long-term stability in their professions and a record of paying their home loan down, which has left them with significant equity. They live well within their means, with school fees, groceries and recreation their biggest expenses.
The Goal
- Refinance the home loan and consolidate a car loan and two credit cards into it
- Set up a debt recycling structure on their financial planner's advice, starting with a $402,000 investment split
- Reduce the non-deductible home loan as fast as possible
- Keep the flexibility to restructure as they go
The Problem
Their debt was spread across four facilities with three lenders, and none of the interest was deductible. Their equity was sitting idle.
Debt recycling is not a one-off transaction. Each time they pay the home loan down, they want to move that amount across to deductible investment debt, and with most lenders each of those moves means a new application.
| Item | Value | Facility | Purpose |
|---|
| Home | $1.26m | Home loan with their previous bank, around $533k | Non-deductible |
| Car | — | $40k car loan | Non-deductible |
| Credit cards | — | $15k across two cards | Non-deductible |
| Home equity | — | Nothing drawn | Unused |
What We Did
- Refinanced the home loan to AMP over 29 years, so the existing expiry date stays as it is.
- Consolidated the $40,000 car loan and $15,000 of credit card debt into the home loan as a single $588,000 owner-occupied split at 6.14%.
- Set up a $1,000,000 Master Limit at 79.49% LVR, on the advice of their financial planner.
- Released $402,000 of equity as the initial investment split at 6.59%, interest only for 10 years.
- Added a $10,000 line of credit at 6.79%, which the Master Limit requires, to take up future redraw funds.
- Placed the lending on a package with extra repayments, offset and free redraw to pay the home loan down quickly.
Why AMP
The strategy depended on the Master Limit, a facility specific to AMP. Refinancing left the couple $324 a year worse off than their existing loan. Staying put would have meant going without it.
- It is one overall lending limit, approved up to 80% LVR or the borrower's capacity, holding up to 10 splits.
- The combined limits of the splits always equal the Master Limit.
- Splits can be opened, resized and switched between products for free over a 5 or 10 year term.
- None of that needs a full application or a property revaluation.
- A line of credit of at least $10,000 is the primary sub-account and takes up remaining equity before it is moved between splits.
For debt recycling, that matters most. As the $588,000 non-deductible split falls, the couple can reassign that limit to the investment split without reassessment.
The Result
| Metric | Figure |
|---|
| Lender | AMP |
| Master Limit | $1,000,000 |
| LVR | 79.49% |
| Loan term | 29 years |
| Non-deductible owner-occupied split | $588,000 at 6.14% |
| Deductible investment split, initial | $402,000 at 6.59%, interest only for 10 years |
| Line of credit | $10,000 at 6.79%, interest only for 10 years |
| Debts consolidated | Home loan, $40,000 car loan, $15,000 across two credit cards |
| Cost compared with the existing loan | $324 a year more |
| Servicing position | Net surplus of over $3,000 a month |
| Future recycling | Investment split can grow as the home split falls, without reassessment |
The Tax Outcome
The $402,000 investment split at 6.59% interest only generates $26,492 of interest in year one. Where that borrowing is used for income-producing investments, and with one partner on the top rate and the other on 30%, each plus the 2% Medicare levy, the anticipated combined saving is $10,464 a year.
| Figure |
|---|
| Annual interest on $402,000 at 6.59% | $26,491.80 |
| Partner 1 marginal rate (45% plus Medicare levy) | 47% |
| Partner 2 marginal rate (30% plus Medicare levy) | 32% |
| Partner 1 anticipated saving (50/50 split assumed) | $6,225.57 |
| Partner 2 anticipated saving (50/50 split assumed) | $4,238.69 |
| Combined anticipated tax saving | $10,464.26 |
*Anticipated figures for year one on the stated assumptions, subject to confirmation by the clients' accountant. We are not tax agents.
Key Takeaways
- Debt recycling is ongoing. A facility that lets limits move between splits without a new application removes most of the friction.
- The cheapest loan is not always the right one: this structure cost $324 a year more and delivered the flexibility the plan needed.
- Consolidating car and card debt into the home loan simplifies repayments, but it remains non-deductible debt to clear first.
See how we approach debt recycling loan structure and splits and which lenders support debt recycling.
More Case Studies
This case study is a real client outcome published anonymously. It is general information only and not financial, tax, credit or legal advice. Figures are specific to this client and are not a guide to the outcome for anyone else. Lender policies, rates and fees are as at the time of the application and change. Seek advice from a licensed broker, financial adviser and registered tax agent.